What's Critical about Critical Phenomenology?

Gayle Salamon

Abstract


This essay considers what is critical in critical phenomenology, and asks what features critical and phenomenological methods share. I suggest three fundamentally significant resonances between the critical and phenomenological enterprises. First is the suggestion that critique, like phenomenology, is an attempt to move beyond a dualism of inside and outside in order to extend into outer regions of what is known. Second is the insistence that what at first appears to be a purely negative endeavor, a finding of limit, is incomplete if, upon finding that limit, it comes to a stop. Just as the reduction is not a means to banish or negate the world, but rather the condition through which it can more fully emerge, critique cannot be merely a cataloguing of the limitations of the present situation.  Third is the openness to the possibilities of the world, a wonder or curiosity, that is revealed through the work of description in phenomenology, or Foucault’s characterization of philosophy not as an unmasking, but a making visible of what is visible. Finally I consider critical phenomenology’s futures:  How is a newly enlivened kind of scholarship emerging from these two forms of thinking, both of which have been dismissed as outmoded or irrelevant? The new work currently emerging in phenomenology, with its emphasis on its own reflexive self-consideration and decolonization, offers hope that it might yet be capacious enough to simultaneously encompass the revelation of its limitations as well as the expansion of its reach.

Keywords


phenomenology; critique; methods; limitations; openness

References


Ahmed, Sara. 2006. Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Durham: Duke University Press.

Allen, Amy. 2016. The End of Progress: Decolonizing the Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.

Best, Stephen and Sharon Marcus. 2009. “Surface Reading: An Introduction.” Representations 108(1): 1–21.

Brown, Wendy. 2005. Edgework: Critical Essays on Knowledge and Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Bruzina, Ronald. 2004. Edmund Husserl and Eugen Fink: Beginnings and Ends in Phenomenology, 1928–1938. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Butler, Judith. 2009. “Critique, Dissent, Disciplinarity.” Critical Inquiry 35(4): 773–795.

Carr, David. 1973. “The ‘Fifth Meditation’ and Husserl’s Cartesianism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 34(1): 14–35.

Davidson, Arnold I. 1997. “Structures and Strategies of Discourse: Remarks Toward a History of Foucault’s Philosophy of Language.” Foucault and his Interlocutors.

Edited by Davidson I. Arnold, 1–20. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Deutscher, Penelope. 2017. Foucault’s Futures: A Critique of Reproductive Reason. New York: Columbia University Press.

Felski, Rita. 2005. The Limits of Critique. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Fink, Eugen. 1981. “The Problem of Edmund Husserl’s Phenomenology.” In Apriori and World: European Contributions to Husserlian Phenomenology, edited and translated by William McKenna, Robert M. Harlan, and Laurence E. Winters, 21–55. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

Foucault, Michel. 1997. “What is Enlightenment.” In Ethics, Subjectivity and Truth, (Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984, Vol. 1), edited by Paul Rabinow. Translated by Robert Hurley and others, 303–320. New York: The New Press.

———. 1980. “Truth and Power.” Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. Edited by Colin Gordon, 63-77. New York: Pantheon.

Guenther, Lisa. 2013. Solitary Confinement: Social Death and its Afterlives. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Irigaray, Luce. 1993. An Ethics of Sexual Difference, translated by Carolyn Burke and Gillian C. Gill. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Larison, Mariana. 2016. L’être en forme. Dialectique et phénomenologie dans la dernière philosophie de Merleau-Ponty. Éditions Mimésis.

Love, Heather. 2010. “Close but not Deep: Descriptive Ethics and the Literary Turn.” New Literary History 41(2): 371–391.

———. 2013. “Close Reading and Thin Description.” Public Culture 25(3 (71)): 401–434.

Marcus, Sharon, Heather Love, and Stephen Best. 2016. “Building a Better Description.” Representations 135(1): 1–21.

Marder, Michael. 2014. Phenomena-critique-logos: The Project of Critical Phenomenology. London: Rowman and Littlefield.

Marratto, Scott. 2017. “Alterity and Expression in Merleau-Ponty: A Response to Levinas.” In Perception and its Development in Merleau-Ponty’s ‘Phenomenology,’ edited by Kirsten Jacobson and John Russon, 242–250. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2012. Phenomenology of Perception, translated by Donald Landes. New York: Routledge.

———. 1968. The Visible and the Invisible, edited by Claude Lefort. Translated by Alfanso Lingis. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

———. nd [1959?]. “Unpublished Note.” Bibliothèque Nationale de France VIII.2.

———. 1964. “The Philosopher and his Shadow.” Signs, 159–181. Translated by Richard C. McCleary. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Morris, David. 2017. “Merleau-Ponty and Mexica Ontology: Time as Templacement.” Paper presented at the International Merleau-Ponty Circle, Albuquerque, NM, November 4, 2017.

Oksala, Johanna. 2016. Feminist Experiences: Foucauldian and Phenomenological Investigations. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Rabinow, Paul. 1997. “Introduction: The History of Systems of Thought.” In Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth (The Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984, Vol. 1), edited by Paul Rabinow, xi-xlii. New York: The New Press.

Sedgwick, Eve. 2003. “Paranoid Reading and Reparative Reading.” Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity, 123–152. Durham: Duke University Press.

Stauffer, Jill. 2015. Ethical Loneliness: The Injustice of Not Being Heard. New York: Columbia University Press.

Velmans, Max. 2007. “Heterophenomenology versus Critical Phenomenology.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6(1–2): 221-230.

Welton, Donn. 1987. “Introduction.” In Critical and Dialectical Phenomenology, edited by Donn Welton and Hugh Silverman, xi-xxiii. Albany: SUNY University Press.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.31608/PJCP.v1i1.2

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Gayle Salamon

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.