Intimacy as Transgression and the Problem of Freedom

Kym Maclaren

Abstract


“To consent to love or be loved,” said Merleau-Ponty, “is to consent also to influence someone else, to decide to a certain extent on behalf of the other.” This essay explicates that idea through a meditation on intimacy. I propose, first, that, on Merleau-Ponty’s account, we are always transgressing into each other’s experience, whether we are strangers or familiars; I call this “ontological intimacy.” Concrete experiences of intimacy are based upon this ontological intimacy, and can take place at two levels: (1) at-this-moment (such that we can experience intimacy even with strangers, by sharing a momentary but extra-ordinary mutual recognition) and (2) in shared interpersonal institutions, or habitual, enduring, and co-enacted visions of who we are, how to live, and what matters. Through particular examples of dynamics within these layers of intimacy (drawing upon work by Berne and by Russon), I claim that we are always, inevitably, imposing an “unfreedom” upon our intimate others. Freedom, then, can only develop from within and by virtue of this “unfreedom.” Thus, what distinguishes empowering or emancipating relationships from oppressive ones is not the removal of transgressive normative social forces; it is rather the particular character of those transgressive forces. Some transgressions upon others’ experience—some forms of “unfreedom”—will tend to promote freedom; others will tend to hinder it. This amounts to a call for promoting agency and freedom not only through critical analysis of public institutions, practices and discourses, but also through critical insight into and transformation of our most private and intimate relationships.

Keywords


intimacy; Merleau-Ponty; transgression; freedom; responsibility

References


Ballard, J.G. 1973. Crash. New York: Picador.

Bateson, Gregory. 1987. “The Cybernetics of Self: a Theory of Alcoholism.” In Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology, 225–244. New York: Ballantine Books.

Benhabib, Seyla, Judith Butler, Drucilla Cornell, and Nancy Fraser. 1995. Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange. New York: Routledge.

Berne, Eric. 1964. Games People Play. New York: Grove Press.

Descartes, René. 1993. Meditations on First Philosophy. Translated by Donald Cress. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.

Fanon, Frantz. 1967. Black Skin White Masks. Translated by Charles Lam Markmann. New York: Grove Press.

Hanisch, Carol. 2006. “The Personal is Political: The Women’s Liberation Movement Classic with a New Explanatory Introduction.” Writings by Carol Hanisch. http://carolhanisch.org/CHwritings/PIP.html

Heidegger, Martin. 2001. Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.

———. 1996. Being and Time. Translated by Joan Stambaugh. Albany: State University of New York Press.

———. 1993a. “Building Dwelling Thinking.” In Martin Heidegger: Basic Writings, edited by David Farrell Krell, 343–364. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.

———. 1993b. “The Question Concerning Technology.” In Martin Heidegger: Basic Writings, edited by David Farrell Krell, 307–342. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.

Hoff, Shannon. 2016. “Pain and Agency: On the Essential Impotence of Vulnerability and Transgression.” In Cultural Ontology of the Self in Pain, edited by Siby George and P.G. Jung, 211-223. New Delhi: Springer.

Horkheimer, Max. 1972. Critical Theory: Selected Essays. Translated by Matthew O’Connell and others. New York: Herder and Herder.

Firestone, Shulamith and Anne Koedt, ed. 1970. Notes from the Second Year: Women’s Liberation: Major Writings of the Radical Feminists. New York: Radical Feminism.

Laing, R.D. 1990. The Divided Self: An Existential Study in Sanity and Madness. Toronto: Penguin Books.

———. 1971. Self and Others. Toronto: Penguin Books.

Lorde, Audre. 1984. “Eye to Eye: Black Women, Hatred, and Anger.” In Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches, 145–175. New York: The Crossing Press.

Maclaren, Kym. 2018 (under review). “The Institution of Freedom.”

———. 2017. “The ‘entre-deux’ of Emotions: Emotional Institutions and their Dialectic.” In Perception and its Development in Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology, edited by John Russon and Kirsten Jacobson, 51–80. Toronto: University ofToronto Press.

Mahmood, Saba. 2011. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2012. Phenomenology of Perception. Translated by Donald Landes. New York: Routledge.

———. 2010. Institution and Passivity: Course Notes from the Collège de France (1954–1955). Translated by Leonard Lawlor and Heath Massey. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

———. 2005. Phénoménologie de la perception. Saint Amand: Gallimard.

———. 2003. L’Institution, la passivité: notes de cours au Collège de France (1954–1955). Paris: Éditions Belin.

———. 2002. Phenomenology of Perception. Translated by Colin Smith. London: Routledge.

———. 1969. “Les Relations avec autrui chez l’enfant.” Paris: Centre de Documentation Universitaire.

———. 1968. The Visible and the Invisible. Edited by Claude Lefort. Translated by Alphonso Lingis. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

———. 1964a. “The Child’s Relations with Others.” Translated by William Cobb. The Primacy of Perception: and other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology, the Philosophy of Art, History, and Politics, edited by James Edie, 96–158. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

———. 1964b. Le Visible et l’invisible. Posthumous text established by Claude Lefort. Saint Amand: Gallimard.

———. 1964c. “The Philosopher and His Shadow.” In Signs. Translated by Richard C. McCleary, 159–181. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Minuchin, Salvador, Bernice Rosman and Lester Baker. 1978. Psychosomatic Families: Anorexia Nervosa in Context. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Moraga, Cherríe and Gloria Anzaldúa, ed. 1983. This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color. New York: Kitchen Table Women of Color Press.

Napier, Augustus Y., and Carl A. Whitaker. 1978. The Family Crucible. Toronto: Bantam Books.

Palmer, Parker J. 2004. “Deep Speaks to Deep.” In A Hidden Wholeness: The Journey toward an Undivided Life, 113-128. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Perez-Darby, Shannon. 2016. “The Secret Joy of Accountability: Self-Accountability as a Building Block for Change.” In The Revolution Starts at Home: Confronting Intimate Violence Within Activist Communities, edited by Ching-In Chen, Jai Dulani, and Leah Lakshmi Piepzna-Samarasinha, 104–114. Chico: AK Press.

Russon, John. 2014. “Between Two Intimacies: The Formative Context of Individual Experience.” Emotion, Space and Society 13: 65–70.

———. 2009. Bearing Witness to Epiphany: Persons, Things, and the Nature of Erotic Life. Albany: SUNY Press.

Sternberg, Robert J. 2006. “A Duplex Theory of Love.” In The New Psychology of Love, edited by Robert J. Sternberg and Karin Weis, 184–199. New Haven: Yale University Press.

———.1998. Cupid’s Arrow: The Course of Love through Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Van Dijk, Ludger, and Erik Rietveld. 2017. “Foregrounding our Sociomaterial Practices in Affordances: The Skilled Intentionality Framework.” Frontiers in Psychology 7: 1–12.

Verhage, Florentien. 2014. “Living With(out) Borders: The Intimacy of Oppression.” Emotion, Space and Society 13: 111–120.

Weiss, Gail. 1999. Body Images: Embodiment as Intercorporeality. New York: Routledge.

Young, Iris Marion. 1990. “Throwing like a Girl: a Phenomenology of Feminine Body Comportment, Motility, and Spatiality.” In Throwing Like a Girl and Other Essays in Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory, 141–159. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.31608/PJCP.v1i1.3

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Kym Maclaren

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.